Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size? In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected. (Evidence-Based Project) Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: 81 (81%) – 90 (90%) 72 (72%) – 80 (80%) 63 (63%) – 71 (71%) 0 (0%) – 62 (62%) 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)


When conducting research and making decisions, it is important to critically analyze the evidence available. This holds true not only in purchasing a new car but also in healthcare, where evidence-based practice plays a crucial role. In this assignment, we will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining our PICO(T) question and analyzing the evidence collected.

PICO(T) Question:

Before we begin analyzing the evidence, let’s review our PICO(T) question. PICO(T) stands for:

– Population or Problem: In this case, the population or problem would be the group of patients or individuals for whom we are seeking a solution or intervention.
– Intervention or Exposure: This refers to the treatment, intervention, or exposure we are interested in exploring.
– Comparison: This refers to the alternative treatments or interventions that we could compare our chosen intervention to.
– Outcome: The outcome refers to the desired outcome or result we hope to achieve with our intervention.
– Time: This refers to the time period over which we are interested in studying the intervention.

By formulating a clear and concise PICO(T) question, we can focus our research efforts and better evaluate the evidence.

Analyzing the Evidence:

Once we have collected evidence related to our PICO(T) question, it is crucial to analyze the evidence in a systematic and critical manner. There are several key factors to consider when analyzing evidence:

1. Source of the Evidence:
It is important to evaluate the source of the evidence. Who produced the report or conducted the research? Are they reputable and reliable? Have they conducted similar studies in the past? By examining the source, we can assess the credibility and validity of the evidence.

2. Study Design:
The design of the study can greatly impact the validity and reliability of the evidence. Was it a randomized controlled trial, a cohort study, or a case-control study? Each study design has its strengths and limitations, and it is important to consider these when evaluating the evidence.

3. Data Collection:
Understanding how the data was collected is crucial. Were objective measurements taken, or were self-reported surveys used? The method of data collection can impact the accuracy and reliability of the evidence.

4. Sample Size:
The size of the sample used in the study is another important factor to consider. A larger sample size generally provides more reliable results. However, if the sample size is too small, the results may not be generalizable to the larger population.

5. Statistical Analysis:
It is important to consider the statistical analysis used in the study. Were appropriate statistical tests conducted to determine the significance of the findings? The use of proper statistical analysis enhances the credibility of the evidence.


In conclusion, analyzing the evidence is crucial in making informed decisions and practicing evidence-based healthcare. By considering the source of the evidence, the study design, data collection method, sample size, and statistical analysis, we can assess the validity and reliability of the evidence. This process ensures that we make well-informed decisions based on the best available evidence.