Watch the following videos, then complete the required assignment. Review the document in Course Resources for instructions on accessing the videos. 15:08 Upon completion of watching the video write up the scenario into a SOAP format. Is there anything you would do differently on your plan? 16:29 Upon completion of watching the video write up the scenario into a SOAP format. Is there anything you would do differently on your plan? Purchase the answer to view it

SOAP Format Analysis in Healthcare Scenario

Introduction
In the field of healthcare, the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) format is widely used for organizing patient information. It allows healthcare professionals to structure their approach and documentation, facilitating communication and continuity of care. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze two videos featuring healthcare scenarios and provide a SOAP format analysis for each. Additionally, the assignment asks us to identify any changes we would make to the plan presented in the videos.

SOAP Format Analysis of Scenario A
Subjective:
Based on the information provided in Scenario A, the patient is a 45-year-old female presenting with severe abdominal pain. She describes the pain as sharp and localized on the right side of her abdomen. The patient reports that the pain started suddenly last night and has worsened since, making it difficult for her to perform daily activities. She denies any previous episodes of similar pain but does mention recent weight loss, loss of appetite, and nausea.

Objective:
Upon physical examination, the patient’s vital signs are within the normal range, with a blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg, heart rate of 80 beats per minute, and temperature of 98.6°F. Palpation of the abdomen reveals tenderness and guarding on the right lower quadrant. The patient’s laboratory workup shows an elevated white blood cell count and a mildly elevated C-reactive protein level.

Assessment:
Based on the subjective and objective findings, the assessment in Scenario A suggests a potential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patient’s symptoms, including sudden onset of severe right lower quadrant pain, tenderness on palpation, and elevated inflammatory markers, are consistent with this condition. However, further diagnostic tests, such as imaging (e.g., ultrasound or CT scan), should be conducted to confirm the diagnosis.

Plan:
The plan in Scenario A involves admitting the patient to the hospital for further evaluation and management. An order for an ultrasound or CT scan is recommended to assess the presence of appendicitis. Additionally, pain management should be initiated, along with intravenous fluids to ensure hydration. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, a surgical consult should be obtained for possible appendectomy. Antibiotics may be initiated empirically to cover for potential infection.

Possible Changes to the Plan:
Upon analyzing the scenario, there are a few changes that could be considered for the plan presented. Firstly, it would be beneficial to include a discussion regarding the risks and benefits of diagnostic imaging (ultrasound or CT scan) with the patient. This would ensure informed decision-making and patient involvement in their care. Additionally, the plan could also include a discussion regarding non-surgical management options for appendicitis, such as antibiotics alone or advanced imaging-guided drainage techniques. These alternatives should be explored to ensure comprehensive care.

SOAP Format Analysis of Scenario B
Subjective:
In Scenario B, the patient is a 65-year-old male presenting with fatigue, shortness of breath, and swelling in the lower extremities. He reports that these symptoms have been gradually worsening over the past few months. The patient states that he has a history of hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. He denies any recent changes in medication or dietary habits.

Objective:
Upon physical examination, the patient has a blood pressure of 160/90 mmHg, heart rate of 76 beats per minute, and oxygen saturation of 93% on room air. Auscultation of the lungs reveals crackles at the bases, and examination of his lower extremities shows pitting edema. Laboratory test results indicate an elevated serum creatinine and anemia.

Assessment:
Based on the subjective and objective findings, the assessment in Scenario B suggests congestive heart failure (CHF) as the primary diagnosis. The patient’s symptoms of fatigue, shortness of breath, and peripheral edema, combined with his medical history and physical examination findings, are consistent with this condition. Further cardiac evaluation, such as an echocardiogram, would be necessary to confirm the diagnosis and assess cardiac function.

Plan:
The plan in Scenario B involves admitting the patient to the hospital for further evaluation and management of congestive heart failure. The patient should receive diuretic therapy to alleviate symptoms of fluid overload and reduce peripheral edema. An echocardiogram should be ordered to assess cardiac function and determine the underlying cause of CHF. Additionally, medications such as ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers may be initiated to optimize heart function.

Possible Changes to the Plan:
Upon analyzing the scenario, it is important to consider a few changes that could enhance the plan presented. Firstly, it would be beneficial to address the patient’s comorbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease) in the plan. Coordinated management of these conditions can contribute to improved overall health outcomes. Secondly, the plan could include a discussion regarding lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes and physical activity, to help control CHF symptoms and reduce the risk of exacerbations.

Conclusion