This assignment is an analysis of local, state, or federal health policy. 1. health policy reform innovation 2. the rationale for the policy, how it was adopted (e.g., federal waivers, passage by state legislature), the funding structure, and (to the extent statistical data are available) its impact. ethical outcome based on evidence. 3. of state innovations include Maryland’s hospital rate setting, Vermont’s single payer system, and Massachusetts’ health reforms Purchase the answer to view it

Analysis of Local, State, or Federal Health Policy: A Case Study


Health policy plays a critical role in shaping the delivery of healthcare services and improving population health outcomes. This analysis focuses on a state-level health policy reform innovation and examines its rationale, adoption process, funding structure, and impact. The policy under consideration is Maryland’s hospital rate setting, which aims to control healthcare costs and promote equitable access to medical services. This analysis will also evaluate the ethical outcome of the policy based on available evidence.


Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy was implemented in the 1970s in response to rising healthcare costs and concerns regarding access to care. At the time, hospital charges were largely unregulated, resulting in significant variations in prices and financial disparities among hospitals. The Hospital Cost Containment Commission (HCCC), a state agency, was established to address these issues and introduced a system of rate setting in which hospitals had to obtain HCCC approval for their charges.

Rationale for the Policy

The primary rationale for Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy was to control healthcare costs and make healthcare services more affordable and accessible. The policy aimed to shift the focus from a fee-for-service reimbursement model to a prospective payment system based on negotiated rates. This approach was expected to incentivize hospitals to operate more efficiently and reduce unnecessary expenditures, while ensuring that hospitals received fair compensation for the services provided.

Adoption Process

Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy was adopted through legislation and subsequent regulatory processes. The policy was enacted by the Maryland General Assembly, which passed the Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) Act in 1971. The HSCRC Act established the Health Services Cost Review Commission to oversee the rate setting process. The HSCRC Act was subsequently amended in 1977 to further strengthen the authority of the commission and expand its scope of activities.

Funding Structure

The funding structure of Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy is primarily based on a global budget payment system. Under this system, hospitals receive fixed annual budgets for patient care, which are determined through a negotiation process between the hospitals and the HSCRC. These budgets are adjusted annually based on factors such as inflation, changes in patient volume, and the hospitals’ financial performance.

The global budget payment system is supported by a combination of funding sources, including federal and state funds, as well as contributions from healthcare payers, such as private insurers and Medicare. The HSCRC also collects revenues from fees and penalties imposed on hospitals for non-compliance with the rate setting requirements. These funds are then used to support the administration of the rate setting process and to finance initiatives aimed at improving healthcare quality and access.

Impact of the Policy

The impact of Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy has been extensively studied and evaluated. Research has shown that the policy has been successful in containing healthcare costs and promoting financial stability among hospitals. For example, a study conducted by the Urban Institute found that the growth rate of hospital spending in Maryland was significantly lower compared to other states with similar characteristics.

Furthermore, the policy has also been associated with improvements in healthcare quality and outcomes. Research has shown that hospitals in Maryland have made significant investments in quality improvement initiatives, such as the reduction of hospital-acquired infections and the implementation of evidence-based practices. These efforts have resulted in improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare disparities.

Ethical Outcome

The ethical outcome of Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy can be evaluated based on the principles of fairness, efficiency, and equitable access to healthcare services. The policy promotes fairness by ensuring that hospitals are reimbursed based on a transparent and negotiated rate, rather than arbitrary charges. This approach helps to reduce financial disparities among hospitals and ensures that healthcare resources are allocated in a more equitable manner.

Moreover, the policy also promotes efficiency by incentivizing hospitals to operate more efficiently and reduce unnecessary expenditures. The use of global budgets encourages hospitals to focus on cost-effective practices and the efficient use of resources, which ultimately benefits patients and the healthcare system as a whole.

In terms of equitable access to healthcare, the policy has been successful in ensuring that hospitals provide services to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. The rate setting system helps to control costs and prevent hospitals from overcharging uninsured or underinsured patients. This helps to reduce financial barriers to care and promotes equal access to healthcare services for all residents of Maryland.

In conclusion, Maryland’s hospital rate setting policy has had a significant impact on healthcare delivery and affordability in the state. The policy has successfully controlled healthcare costs, improved healthcare quality, and promoted equitable access to services. The ethical outcome of the policy is positive, as it promotes fairness, efficiency, and equitable access to healthcare resources.