Question: Considering the social determinants of health, do you think commercial-free initiatives will change marketing building in the schools? What are the Pros and Con (minimum 200 words each) Question: Who should be responsible for addressing hunger and food insecurity? (private, public or civic responsibility) If Private why?(minimum 200 words) If Public why(minimum 200 words Question: What can we as a society do to assure older adults stay healthy? Give 3 samples and explain (minimum 200 words each)

Topic: Considering the social determinants of health, do you think commercial-free initiatives will change marketing building in the schools?


The impact of marketing in schools and its influence on children’s health has raised concerns globally. This essay aims to explore the potential of commercial-free initiatives in transforming marketing practices within schools, considering the social determinants of health. Commercial-free initiatives refer to efforts aimed at reducing or eliminating marketing and advertising within educational settings for the promotion of healthier lifestyles. This essay will present the pros and cons of such initiatives, analyzing their potential implications and limitations in creating a healthier school environment.

Pros of commercial-free initiatives in schools:

1. Protecting children from harmful marketing influence:
Commercial-free initiatives can shield children from the influence of marketing that often promotes unhealthy products, such as sugary beverages and processed snacks. By removing advertising from schools, children are less likely to be exposed to persuasive marketing messages that impact their dietary choices and overall health.

2. Promoting healthier choices:
Commercial-free initiatives can create an environment that fosters healthier choices among students. In the absence of marketing-driven messaging, schools can prioritize the promotion of nutritious foods and engage in educational campaigns that encourage physical activity. By eliminating the emphasis on unhealthy products, children are more likely to choose healthier options, positively impacting their health and well-being.

3. Reducing health disparities:
By reducing the exposure to marketing in schools, commercial-free initiatives can assist in mitigating health disparities among various socioeconomic groups. Research has indicated that children from lower-income backgrounds are more susceptible to marketing influence and tend to make unhealthy choices as a result. Targeting marketing practices within schools can help level the playing field and promote healthier behaviors across all socio-economic groups.

Cons of commercial-free initiatives in schools:

1. Financial implications:
Commercial partnerships in schools often provide significant financial support for educational programs and resources. The removal of marketing from schools can lead to decreased funding, potentially impacting the availability of educational materials and extracurricular activities. Finding alternative sources of funding to compensate for this loss can be challenging, particularly for schools in low-income communities.

2. Impact on school resources:
Commercial-free initiatives require additional resources to implement and maintain. Schools need to allocate time, staff, and financial resources to develop alternative educational programs and campaigns. This can place a burden on already limited school resources, potentially diverting attention and resources away from other essential aspects of education.

3. Limited impact on external marketing:
While commercial-free initiatives can eliminate marketing within the school premises, they may have limited influence on marketing outside the school environment. Children are exposed to marketing messages through various media channels, including television, online platforms, and billboards. Removing marketing from schools alone may not be sufficient to counteract the overall impact of marketing on children’s health behaviors.


Commercial-free initiatives have the potential to transform marketing practices in schools and promote healthier choices among children. The elimination of marketing within schools can protect children from harmful marketing influence, promote healthier choices, and reduce health disparities among socio-economic groups. However, these initiatives also come with challenges, including financial implications and limitations in addressing external marketing influences. A comprehensive approach that combines commercial-free initiatives with broader public policies targeting marketing practices is necessary for effective change.