PART 1: 4/4/19 SUBMISSION OF RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUES Each student will write three research critiques from articles focused on research in healthcare informatics . The student should complete each critique utilizing the  . The critiques do not have to be written in narrative form. All critiques should be submitted as one  document. Requirements Title: Author(s): Purpose: Theoretical Framework: Population/Sample: Setting: Instrumentation (including validity and reliability): Research Design: Statistical Methods and Findings: (quantitative studies) Implications of the findings: Generalizability of the findings: (quantitative studies) Limitations:  Study recommendations:  Relevance of article research to your study: Bias: PART 2: 4/14/19 SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUES  –  The student will synthesize the information  contained in the three articles completed  for Part 1 of the assignment. The synthesis should be in written format utilizing APA style and conventions. The document should contain a title page, body (2-page minimum, 3 pages maximum), and reference page. Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it

Title: Analyzing Research Articles in Healthcare Informatics

Author(s): [Name of the authors of the research articles]

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to critically analyze three research articles in the field of healthcare informatics. The goal of this analysis is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the articles and evaluate their relevance to the study at hand.

Theoretical Framework: Theoretical frameworks provide a foundation for research studies and guide the researchers in their exploration of a particular topic. To evaluate the theoretical framework of each article, consider whether the authors have clearly defined their conceptual framework and if they have utilized existing theories or models relevant to healthcare informatics.

Population/Sample: The population or sample refers to the group of individuals or objects that the researchers have studied. Assess whether the authors have clearly defined the population or sample in their study and if they have provided a rationale for their selection. Additionally, consider whether the sample size is appropriate for the research question and if any potential biases or limitations exist in the sampling process.

Setting: The setting of a research study refers to the location or context in which the research was conducted. Evaluate whether the authors have clearly described the setting of their study and if it is appropriate for the research question. Consider any potential influences that the setting may have on the study findings.

Instrumentation (including validity and reliability): Instrumentation refers to the tools or measures used by the researchers to collect data. Evaluate whether the authors have provided a detailed description of the instruments used and the validity and reliability of these instruments. Consider any potential limitations or biases in the measurement process.

Research Design: The research design refers to the overall approach or strategy employed by the researchers to address their research question. Assess whether the authors have clearly stated the research design used and if it is appropriate for their research objectives. Consider any potential biases or limitations inherent in the research design.

Statistical Methods and Findings: For quantitative studies, evaluate the statistical methods employed by the researchers to analyze their data. Assess whether the statistical methods are appropriate for the research question and if they are adequately described. Additionally, consider the significance and interpretation of the findings in relation to the research question.

Implications of the findings: Evaluate the implications of the findings in relation to healthcare informatics. Consider how the findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge and if they have practical implications for healthcare practitioners or policymakers.

Generalizability of the findings: For quantitative studies, assess the generalizability of the findings. Consider whether the sample used in the study is representative of the target population and if the findings can be applied to other contexts or settings.

Limitations: Identify and critique any limitations or weaknesses of the research articles. Consider any potential sources of bias, methodological limitations, or external factors that may have influenced the study findings.

Study recommendations: Assess whether the authors have provided any recommendations for future research based on their findings. Consider the potential implications of these recommendations for advancing knowledge in healthcare informatics.

Relevance of article research to your study: Evaluate the relevance of the article research to your study or research interests. Consider how the findings and insights from the articles can contribute to your own research or practice in healthcare informatics.

Bias: Critically analyze any potential biases that may exist in the research articles. Consider the authors’ perspectives, affiliations, funding sources, or any other factors that may introduce bias into the study.

In Part 2 of this assignment, you will synthesize the information from the three research article critiques completed in Part 1. The synthesis should be written in APA style and should include a title page, body (a minimum of 2 pages and a maximum of 3 pages), and a reference page. The synthesis should provide a comprehensive overview of the main findings, strengths, weaknesses, and implications of the three articles.