Nursing Research WK 15 You have been asked to be a peer reviewer for a team of nurse researchers who are conducting a phenomenological study of the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy. 1) What specific questions would you ask the team during debriefing 2) What documents would you want the researchers to share? INSTRUCTIONS: APA FORMAT 3 PARAGRAPHS WITH 3 SENTENCES FOR EACH QUESTION IN TEXT CITATIONS WITH 3 REFERENCES NO LESS THAN 5 YEARS

During debriefing with the team of nurse researchers conducting a phenomenological study on the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy, there are several specific questions that can be asked to ensure a comprehensive understanding of their research methodology and findings. These questions aim to provide clarity, gather additional information, and prompt critical analysis. In order to establish a well-rounded review, it is important to request specific documents that will aid in the evaluation of the study and its validity. The following paragraphs will outline the specific questions and documents that would be beneficial during the peer review process.

1) Specific Questions:
a) What is the rationale behind choosing a phenomenological approach for this study? – This question allows the researchers to articulate their reasoning for selecting a phenomenological methodology, which focuses on understanding the lived experiences of individuals. Understanding their rationale will provide insight into their choice and allow for an evaluation of its suitability for the research question at hand.

b) Is the sample size sufficient for a phenomenological study? – Phenomenological studies often involve a smaller sample size to deeply explore the experiences of a select group of participants. However, it is important to ensure that the sample size is appropriate for capturing the richness and diversity of experiences related to physical abuse during pregnancy. Understanding the researchers’ justification for their chosen sample size will provide insight into its adequacy.

c) How were the participants recruited and selected? – Understanding the recruitment and selection process is crucial in assessing the external validity of the study. This question will shed light on whether the participants represent a diverse range of experiences related to physical abuse during pregnancy, ensuring that the findings can be generalized to similar populations.

2) Relevant Documents:
a) Research proposal – Reviewing the research proposal will provide insight into the study’s overall design, research question, and objectives. It will also allow for an evaluation of the coherence between the proposal and the actual study implementation.

b) Informed consent forms – Reviewing the informed consent forms is essential to ensure that ethical considerations have been appropriately addressed. It will help determine whether the participants were adequately informed about the study’s purpose, procedures, and potential risks and benefits.

c) Interview protocol – Requesting the interview protocol will provide insight into the questions asked during data collection. Examining the interview questions will help assess whether they are clear, comprehensive, and directly related to the study’s research question, ensuring the collection of relevant data.

In conclusion, being a peer reviewer for a team of nurse researchers conducting a phenomenological study on the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy requires asking specific questions during debriefing and requesting relevant documents. These questions should aim to clarify the researchers’ rationale, assess the suitability of their methodology, and ensure the diversity and representativeness of the selected sample. Requesting documents such as the research proposal, informed consent forms, and interview protocol will provide valuable insights into the study’s design, ethical considerations, and data collection procedures. By critically evaluating the methodology and supporting documentation, the peer review process can contribute to the rigor and validity of the research study.