Link to access scenario: Complete the character role of primary care physician Dr. Martin Bright. You can work through this character more than once, making different decisions to alter the outcome. Once you have completed this role, answer the following: What decisions did you make in this scenario? Did you change any of your answers? Did anything surprise you? As a public health professional, how can you work with primary care physicians on the opioid crisis?

Primary Care Physician Dr. Martin Bright is faced with a challenging scenario involving the opioid crisis. In this scenario, Dr. Bright encounters a patient suffering from chronic pain who is currently on long-term opioid therapy. The patient, Mr. Johnson, is requesting an increase in his opioid dosage due to the increasing severity of his pain.

Dr. Bright must carefully consider his options and make informed decisions regarding the patient’s treatment. Throughout the scenario, Dr. Bright is presented with a series of choices that will influence the outcome of the patient’s treatment and the potential consequences of his decisions.

The decisions that I made as Dr. Martin Bright in this scenario were to:

1. Engage in a comprehensive assessment: I decided to conduct a thorough evaluation of Mr. Johnson’s pain, medical history, and previous treatments. This includes assessing his pain intensity, functional impairment, and risk factors for opioid misuse.

2. Explore non-opioid alternatives: Given the potential risks of long-term opioid therapy, I made the decision to explore non-opioid alternatives such as physical therapy, non-opioid medications, and complementary therapies before considering any increase in Mr. Johnson’s opioid dosage.

3. Initiate a discussion about the risks and benefits: I decided to have an open and honest conversation with Mr. Johnson about the potential risks and benefits of increasing his opioid dosage. This included discussing the potential for opioid dependence, overdose, and the limited evidence supporting long-term opioid use for chronic pain.

4. Collaborate with a multidisciplinary team: Recognizing the complexity of Mr. Johnson’s case, I decided to involve additional healthcare professionals, such as pain specialists, addiction specialists, and mental health professionals, to provide comprehensive care and expertise in managing chronic pain.

5. Develop a treatment plan with shared decision-making: In collaboration with Mr. Johnson, I made the decision to develop a personalized treatment plan that incorporated non-opioid alternatives, such as physical therapy and non-opioid medications. This plan also included regular reassessment and monitoring of Mr. Johnson’s pain and function.

As I progressed through the scenario, I did not change any of my initial decisions, as I strongly believed in following evidence-based guidelines and prioritizing patient safety. However, I did encounter some surprises along the way. One surprise was the patient’s strong insistence on increasing his opioid dosage, despite the potential risks involved. This highlighted the challenging nature of managing chronic pain and the need for effective communication and patient education on the risks and benefits of treatment options.

As a public health professional, there are several ways to collaborate with primary care physicians on addressing the opioid crisis:

1. Education and training: Public health professionals can provide educational resources and training to primary care physicians on the appropriate use of opioids, screening for substance use disorders, and alternative pain management strategies. This includes promoting the use of evidence-based guidelines and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making into clinical practice.

2. Collaboration in policy development: Public health professionals can work with primary care physicians and other stakeholders to develop and advocate for policies that promote safer prescribing practices, increase access to non-opioid therapies, and expand resources for addiction treatment and support services.

3. Data monitoring and surveillance: Public health professionals can collaborate with primary care physicians to establish data monitoring and surveillance systems to track opioid prescribing patterns, identify areas of high-risk prescribing, and evaluate the impact of interventions aimed at reducing opioid-related harm.

4. Integration of care: Public health professionals can support the integration of addiction treatment services and mental health support into primary care settings, enabling a more holistic approach to managing patients with chronic pain and substance use disorders.

5. Community engagement and public awareness: Public health professionals can engage with primary care physicians and the wider community to increase awareness about the risks of opioids, promote safe storage and disposal of medications, and encourage the use of alternative pain management strategies.

In conclusion, the scenario of Dr. Martin Bright highlights the complex decisions that primary care physicians face in managing patients with chronic pain and potential opioid dependence. By prioritizing comprehensive assessments, exploring non-opioid alternatives, involving multidisciplinary teams, and practicing shared decision-making, primary care physicians can play a crucial role in addressing the opioid crisis. Public health professionals can support primary care physicians through education, policy development, data monitoring, integration of care, and community engagement.