IT Diffusion Models · Review the IT diffusion models, selec…

IT Diffusion Models · Review the IT diffusion models, select two models, then compare and contrast how these models would facilitate a company in the country and business sector of your choice. Be sure to state your business sector. Then, explain how the IT diffusion models may affect it. · Describe the process of how a non-IT senior manager would arrive at the decision to support one IT diffusion model over another. List the factors that would have to be considered. Determine which model you would choose and explain why. Strategic Alignment · Evaluate the approaches by company executives to align an organization for future growth and success. Give your opinion on the credibility of each approach. · Discuss additional approaches not mentioned in the textbook that may be warranted in aligning an organization for future growth and success. Explain your response. Purchase the answer to view it

Title: A Comparative Analysis of IT Diffusion Models and Strategic Alignment Approaches for Future Growth and Success in the Business Sector


The rapid advancement of information technology (IT) has significantly influenced the way organizations operate and has become a crucial factor in determining their success. As companies seek efficient and effective strategies to incorporate IT into their business activities, various IT diffusion models have emerged to guide this process. This paper aims to compare and contrast two IT diffusion models and evaluate their potential impact on a chosen business sector. Additionally, it examines the decision-making process for non-IT senior managers in selecting an IT diffusion model, while considering the factors that affect this decision. Furthermore, the paper evaluates different approaches used by executives to align organizations for future growth and success, including additional approaches not mentioned in the textbook.

Comparative Analysis of IT Diffusion Models:

In selecting two IT diffusion models for comparison, the Business Sector of choice is the manufacturing industry. The manufacturing sector heavily relies on IT to enhance productivity, optimize supply chains, and ensure operational efficiency. The two IT diffusion models chosen for analysis are the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT).

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) posits that a user’s acceptance and adoption of technology are influenced by perceived usefulness and ease of use. In the manufacturing sector, TAM could facilitate IT diffusion by ensuring that the technology implemented aligns with the organization’s goals and is perceived as beneficial and easy to use by employees and stakeholders. By assessing user perceptions, TAM enables organizations to make informed decisions regarding technology adoption, thus enhancing the chances of successful IT diffusion.

On the other hand, the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) focuses on the process of how innovations spread through social systems. In the manufacturing sector, IDT would facilitate IT diffusion by considering factors such as the characteristics of the innovation, communication channels, and the social system’s readiness for change. By examining the factors that affect the rate of adoption, IDT helps organizations understand how to effectively introduce new IT innovations, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful diffusion.

The impact of these IT diffusion models on the manufacturing sector is significant. By adopting TAM, organizations can minimize resistance to change, enhance user satisfaction and adoption rates, thus improving their overall productivity and competitiveness. Similarly, IDT helps organizations implement IT innovations in a manner that aligns with the social structure of the manufacturing sector, increasing the chances of successful diffusion without disrupting existing processes.

Decision-Making in IT Diffusion Model Selection:

For a non-IT senior manager to select an appropriate IT diffusion model, several factors must be considered. Firstly, an assessment of the organization’s goals and the alignment of the IT diffusion model’s objectives with these goals is crucial. Additionally, consideration must be given to the level of complexity and investment required for implementing the chosen model. Other factors include the organization’s resources, technological infrastructure, employee skills, and the degree of organizational readiness for change. Furthermore, the support and commitment of top management and stakeholders, as well as potential risks and benefits, need to be evaluated to ensure the selection of the most suitable IT diffusion model.


In conclusion, the selection and implementation of an appropriate IT diffusion model are vital for ensuring successful technology adoption and integration within the manufacturing sector. The TAM and IDT models provide distinct approaches to guide organizations in adopting and diffusing IT innovations effectively. By carefully considering the factors outlined in the decision-making process, non-IT senior managers can choose the most suitable IT diffusion model. The chosen model should align with the organization’s goals, consider resource availability and organizational readiness, and optimize the chances of successful IT diffusion.

Strategic Alignment Approaches for Future Growth and Success:

In evaluating the approaches used by company executives to align an organization for future growth and success, it is important to consider their credibility. The approaches discussed in the textbook include strategic planning, strategic change management, and strategic human resource management. Strategic planning involves setting goals, formulating strategies, and defining action plans to achieve them. Strategic change management focuses on managing change effectively to achieve the desired strategic outcomes. Strategic human resource management emphasizes aligning the human resource function with the overall strategic objectives of the organization.

The credibility of each approach depends on factors such as the nature of the organization, its industry, and the specific challenges it faces. Strategic planning is a widely used approach and is credible when organizations face predictable and stable environments. It provides a framework for systematic decision-making and resource allocation. Strategic change management is credible when organizations confront turbulent environments, requiring them to be adaptive and responsive. It emphasizes flexibility and agility in managing change. Strategic human resource management is credible when organizations recognize that human capital is a key driver of competitive advantage. It emphasizes aligning HR policies and practices with the organization’s strategic goals to maximize employee performance and development.

However, there are additional approaches not mentioned in the textbook that may be warranted for aligning an organization for future growth and success. One such approach is strategic innovation management. This approach focuses on fostering a culture of innovation, exploring new business models, and continuously seeking out novel opportunities for growth and differentiation. In today’s rapidly changing business environment, organizations must be proactive and innovative in order to stay ahead of competition and achieve sustained growth.

Another approach that may be warranted is strategic alliances and partnerships. This approach involves collaborating with external entities to access resources, capabilities, and markets that are unattainable alone. Strategic alliances can facilitate market expansion, technology transfer, and knowledge sharing, all of which are crucial for future growth and success in highly competitive industries.

In conclusion, the credibility of strategic alignment approaches depends on various factors, including the organization’s context and challenges. While strategic planning, strategic change management, and strategic human resource management are credible approaches, additional approaches such as strategic innovation management and strategic alliances may be warranted in specific situations. Organizations must carefully evaluate their unique circumstances and adopt a holistic approach to align themselves for future growth and success.