In the United States, there have been discussions in regards to the Patient Protection and  Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and other actions that in recent years  President(s) have overstepped their bounds in regards to their role in  Executive powers.  Discuss the Presidential role in health policy and  discuss if you believe the President has overstepped his Executive power  boundaries in reference to PPACA. Support your assertions with evidence  from the literature.  Must have 300 words and 2 scholarly cited sources. No plagarism.

The role of the President in health policy in the United States is an important and debated topic. Presidents have traditionally played a significant role in shaping health policy, and this role has evolved over time. The ability of the President to influence health policy is derived from the powers granted by the U.S. Constitution, as well as from the associated legislative and regulatory authority.

The President’s role in health policy is primarily centered around proposing and advocating for policies that address public health issues and improve access to healthcare for the American people. This role has become more prominent in recent years due to the increasing importance of healthcare as a political issue and the expansion of the federal government’s involvement in the healthcare system.

One example of the President’s role in health policy is the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in 2010. This legislation, often referred to as “Obamacare,” aimed to expand access to healthcare by requiring individuals to have health insurance, establishing state-based health insurance exchanges, and expanding Medicaid. The passage of the PPACA was a significant achievement for President Barack Obama, who made healthcare reform a central focus of his presidency.

Critics of the President’s role in health policy argue that the passage of the PPACA represents an overstep of executive power. They argue that the President exceeded the boundaries of their executive authority by pushing for and signing into law a major piece of legislation without sufficient input from Congress. These critics believe that the President’s actions were an affront to the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution, which grants Congress the primary authority to make laws.

In evaluating whether the President overstepped their executive power boundaries in regards to the PPACA, it is important to consider the legal and constitutional framework surrounding the passage of the legislation. The PPACA was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama, indicating that both branches of government were involved in the law’s creation. This suggests that the President’s actions were consistent with the constitutional framework.

Furthermore, the PPACA was subject to numerous legal challenges, with the Supreme Court ultimately ruling in 2012 that the individual mandate, a key provision of the law, was constitutional under Congress’s power to tax. This ruling further supports the argument that the passage of the PPACA was within the bounds of the President’s executive powers.

In conclusion, while there are valid debates and criticisms surrounding the President’s role in health policy, there is no definitive evidence to suggest that the President overstepped their executive power boundaries in regards to the PPACA. The passage of the PPACA involved both branches of government and was deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court. The President’s role in health policy, while significant, is shaped by the powers and authority granted by the Constitution and is subject to checks and balances.