Discussion 10: Morality In Chapter 14 of your textbook, you read about the work of Purtilo and Doherty (2011), who divide morality into three categories: personal, social, and group. Review this section of the chapter, then respond to the following questions: Your response should be 8 – 10 sentences in length and include an APA-style references list. Respond to at least two other students in 4 – 6 sentences, referring to the textbook or other course material in your responses.

Morality is a complex topic that has been explored by many scholars. In Chapter 14 of our textbook, the authors Purtilo and Doherty (2011) discuss three categories of morality: personal, social, and group.

Personal morality refers to an individual’s own sense of right and wrong. It encompasses the values, principles, and ethical standards that guide a person’s actions and decision-making. Personal morality is subjective and varies from person to person based on their upbringing, culture, and personal beliefs.

Social morality, on the other hand, pertains to the collective moral values and norms within a society. It includes societal expectations, laws, and social contracts that dictate acceptable behavior. Social morality serves to maintain social order, promote fairness, and protect the well-being of individuals and the community as a whole.

Lastly, group morality involves the moral values and norms within a specific group or community. It is more narrow in scope compared to social morality and can be influenced by factors such as shared goals, beliefs, and group dynamics. Group morality may differ from the wider societal morality and can lead to conflicts between different groups with divergent moral perspectives.

The categorization of morality into these three categories provides a useful framework for understanding how morality operates in various contexts. Individual moral choices are influenced by both personal and social factors, while group morality adds another layer of complexity to the moral landscape.

In conclusion, Purtilo and Doherty’s division of morality into personal, social, and group categories helps us comprehend the multifaceted nature of morality and its influence on decision-making at the individual, societal, and group levels. By considering these categories, we can deepen our understanding of the various factors that shape moral behavior.

Reference:
Purtilo, R. B., & Doherty, R. F. (2011). Health professional and the law. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

Response 1:
I agree with your analysis of the three categories of morality outlined by Purtilo and Doherty. Personal morality is indeed subjective and can be influenced by an individual’s personal beliefs and experiences. It is interesting to consider how personal morality can sometimes conflict with societal or group morality, leading to moral dilemmas. For example, an individual may hold personal beliefs that are not aligned with the prevailing social or group norms, which can create tension and ethical challenges. Overall, the division of morality into these categories provides a valuable framework for understanding the complexities of moral decision-making.

Response 2:
I found your discussion of the three categories of morality to be insightful. I would like to build upon the idea that group morality can differ from societal morality. In certain situations, group morality may even take precedence over societal morality, which can lead to tensions and conflicts. This highlights the importance of considering not only individual and societal moral perspectives but also the specific moral values and norms within different groups. Additionally, it would be interesting to explore how these categories of morality intersect with other factors such as cultural diversity and professional ethics.