Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research.Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings.Discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers findings.400-word minimum/550-word maximum without the references.Minimum of 3 references (the course textbook must be one of the references) in APA format, must have been published within last 3-5 yearsnote :

Critiquing the quality of literature reviews is an important aspect of evaluating research studies. In this analysis, two different types of studies will be examined: a quantitative research study and a qualitative research study. The literature reviews conducted for these studies will be assessed based on various components such as research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. Additionally, the credibility of the sources and the researchers’ findings will be discussed.

Firstly, the research questions of the studies should be clear, specific, and align with the purpose of the research. In the quantitative study, the research question may focus on the relationship between two variables or the effectiveness of an intervention. On the other hand, the research question in the qualitative study may explore participants’ experiences or perceptions related to a particular phenomenon. Both studies should have well-defined research questions that guide the entire research process.

Sampling and sample sizes are crucial aspects of any study. In quantitative research, probability sampling methods such as random sampling or stratified sampling are commonly used to ensure the representativeness of the sample. The sample size should be large enough to provide sufficient statistical power and generalizability of the findings. In contrast, qualitative research often involves purposive sampling, where participants are selected based on specific criteria that align with the research goals. The sample size is typically smaller but should be adequate to reach data saturation, meaning that no new information or themes emerge from additional participants.

The research designs used in the studies also differ for quantitative and qualitative research. Quantitative research aims to measure and quantify variables, often using experimental or quasi-experimental designs. These designs allow researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships. On the other hand, qualitative research employs designs such as grounded theory, ethnography, or phenomenology, which focus on understanding the meaning and context of experiences.

In terms of hypothesis, quantitative research usually involves testing a null hypothesis, which states that there is no relationship between variables. Researchers then try to gather evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of an alternative hypothesis. Qualitative research does not typically involve hypothesis testing but rather aims to explore and generate theories or hypotheses based on the collected data.

Regarding data collection methods, quantitative research relies on standardized instruments such as questionnaires or scales to collect numerical data. These methods allow for the collection of large amounts of data for statistical analysis. In contrast, qualitative research utilizes methods such as interviews, observations, or focus groups to collect rich, in-depth, and non-numerical data. These methods enable researchers to gain insight into participants’ subjective experiences.

The research findings of both studies should be clearly presented and supported by the collected data. In quantitative research, statistical analysis is used to examine relationships between variables and determine the significance of the findings. The findings should be discussed in relation to the research questions and hypotheses. In qualitative research, findings are often presented as themes or categories that emerge from the data. These findings should be contextualized and supported with quotes or examples from the participants.

The credibility of the sources used in the literature reviews is essential to ensure the reliability and validity of the research. Both primary and secondary sources should be considered. Primary sources include peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, or research reports, while secondary sources may include books or literature reviews. The sources should be current and published within the last 3-5 years to ensure the use of up-to-date, relevant information.

Furthermore, the credibility of the researchers’ findings can be assessed based on their expertise, reputation, and previous research experience. Additionally, the use of rigorous research methods, appropriate data collection and analysis techniques, and transparency in reporting the research process contribute to the credibility of the findings.

In conclusion, critiquing the quality of literature reviews in research studies involves assessing various components such as research questions, sampling and sample sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. Additionally, the credibility of the sources and the researchers’ findings should be examined. By critically evaluating these aspects, researchers can determine the overall quality and rigor of the studies.