Christian values are in the news frequently. Describe an example within the past year that includes an issue or environment related to health care. Locate an electronic media article and explain how the story frames the ethical considerations of the topic, addressing whether the position is fairly or equally provided the media source. Determine whether you are able to identify the journalistic preference in the outcome. You must provide the link to the electronic media article.  PLEASE INCLUDE IN-TEXT CITATION AND REFERENCE

Article: “Christian Pharmacists Challenge Washington State’s Abortion Mandate” – https://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-pharmacists-challenge-washington-state-abortion-mandate.html

Introduction:
Christian values have a significant impact on various aspects of society, including health care. Ethical considerations involving Christian values can arise in debates related to reproductive health care, end-of-life decisions, and the availability of certain medical procedures. This paper will analyze an article published by the Christian Post, titled “Christian Pharmacists Challenge Washington State’s Abortion Mandate,” which discusses the ethical dilemmas faced by Christian pharmacists in relation to Washington state’s abortion mandate. The article will be examined in terms of how it frames the ethical considerations of the topic and whether the position is fairly presented by the media source. Additionally, an attempt will be made to identify any journalistic preferences in the outcome of the story.

Summary of the Article:
The article highlights the case of multiple Christian pharmacists in Washington state who are challenging a regulation that requires them to dispense abortion-inducing drugs despite their religious objections. The pharmacists argue that this regulation violates their First Amendment rights and forces them to participate in a practice that goes against their deeply held religious beliefs. The story focuses on the ethical considerations of the issue from the perspective of the Christian pharmacists, portraying them as individuals who are fighting for their right to practice their faith openly in their profession.

Framing of Ethical Considerations:
The article predominantly frames the ethical considerations of the topic through the lens of religious freedom and the rights of Christian pharmacists to conscientiously object to participating in abortion-related activities. It emphasizes how these individuals are standing up for their religious beliefs in the face of what they perceive as a violation of their constitutional rights. By highlighting the personal stories and religious convictions of the pharmacists involved, the article aims to evoke empathy and understanding for their perspective on the issue.

While the article mainly focuses on the rights of the Christian pharmacists, it does briefly mention the counterargument made by Pro-Choice advocates who argue that health care professionals should not be allowed to deny services based on personal beliefs. However, this counterargument is not given as much prominence as the pharmacists’ viewpoint. The article could have provided a more balanced analysis by delving deeper into the arguments put forth by both sides.

Fairness in Media Source Presentation:
As an article published in the Christian Post, a religious media source, it is important to consider the potential bias and agenda that may influence the presentation of the topic. Given the nature and purpose of the Christian Post, one could assume a predisposition towards supporting the pharmacists’ stance based on Christian values and religious freedom.

Despite this potential bias, the article does provide some balance by including statements from both the pharmacists and their opponents. Additionally, it mentions the legal arguments both for and against the regulation. However, the weight and emphasis given to the pharmacists’ perspective, coupled with the lack of in-depth exploration of the opposing viewpoint, suggest a potential bias towards supporting the Christian pharmacists.

Journalistic Preference in the Outcome:
The article does not explicitly advocate for a particular outcome or take a firm stand on the issue. However, by highlighting the pharmacists’ religious convictions and their fight for religious freedom, the article implicitly leans towards a favorable outcome for the Christian pharmacists who are challenging the abortion mandate. This preference is likely driven by the Christian Post’s readership base and the publication’s alignment with Christian values.

Conclusion:
In analyzing the article “Christian Pharmacists Challenge Washington State’s Abortion Mandate” published by the Christian Post, it becomes evident that the ethical considerations of the topic are predominantly framed through the lens of religious freedom and the rights of Christian pharmacists. Despite including some opposing perspectives, the article leans towards supporting the position of the Christian pharmacists. This inclination suggests a journalistic preference in the outcome that aligns with the values and agenda of the Christian Post.