2)¨**********APA norms  ( All paragraphs need to be cited properly. All responses must be in a narrative format and each paragraph must have at least 4 sentences) 4) **********References from the last 7 years ________________________________________________ The purpose of this Assignment is to help you learn to conduct a review of the literature, correctly identify the level of evidence of primary sources on the evidence hierarchy, and to critique the important aspects of a scholarly research report.

The purpose of this assignment is to provide a thorough understanding of how to conduct a review of the literature, accurately determine the level of evidence of primary sources on the evidence hierarchy, and critique the essential aspects of a scholarly research report. By accomplishing these objectives, students will develop a proficient knowledge of research methodology and be able to critically assess the quality and validity of research studies.

Conducting a review of the literature is a fundamental step in the research process. It involves systematically exploring and analyzing the existing body of knowledge on a particular topic. The literature review serves several purposes, such as identifying gaps in the current understanding, finding relevant theoretical frameworks, and providing the necessary background information for a research study. To conduct a comprehensive literature review, it is important to search a variety of sources including scholarly journals, books, conference proceedings, and online databases. The chosen sources should be relevant to the research question and provide a balanced view of the topic.

In addition to conducting a literature review, it is crucial to accurately determine the level of evidence of primary sources on the evidence hierarchy. The evidence hierarchy is a classification system that ranks different types of research studies based on their level of validity and reliability. It enables researchers to assess the strength of the evidence and make informed decisions about the applicability of research findings. The evidence hierarchy generally includes systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the top, followed by randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, and expert opinion at the bottom. By understanding the evidence hierarchy, researchers can critically evaluate the quality and rigor of primary sources and determine their suitability for informing practice.

Critiquing the important aspects of a scholarly research report involves a thorough evaluation of its methodology, results, and conclusions. Methodology refers to the overall design and conduct of the study, including the research question, study population, data collection methods, and statistical analyses. It is important to assess the appropriateness and validity of the methodology to ensure that the study has been conducted in a rigorous and systematic manner. Results refer to the findings of the study and should be analyzed and interpreted in relation to the research question. Critically evaluating the results involves assessing the statistical significance, clinical relevance, and generalizability of the findings. Conclusions should be supported by the study results and should accurately reflect the limitations and implications of the research. It is important to identify any biases, errors, or limitations in the research report that may impact the validity and applicability of the findings.

Overall, conducting a review of the literature, determining the level of evidence, and critiquing a scholarly research report are essential skills for researchers and healthcare professionals. These skills enable individuals to stay current with the latest evidence, make informed decisions about practice, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their field. By completing this assignment, students will gain a solid foundation in research methodology and develop critical thinking abilities that are crucial for success in the field of research.